| What Cubans expect from Obama |
|
|
|
|
By Manuel E. Yepe Read Spanish Version From WalterLippmann.com
As
expected, Barack Obama's electoral win has raised new questions all
over the world given the United States of America's place in the
current system of international relations.
That
a non-white, non-WASP American has been elected president of the U.S.
for the first time in history goes beyond the superpower's global
policy or any consideration related to Obama's skin color or ethnic
group. What matters is that it raises hopes for an end of the
ferocious hostilities toward the revolutionary project embraced by
our people as the crowning achievement of an independence struggle
started 140 years ago against Spanish colonialism.
As we
Cubans know only too well from our own hard experience, the facts and
promises underlying this historic event --should they be fulfilled--
would inevitably lead to a counterattack by the big financial and
industrial/military corporations whose grim interests would be
affected.
In order to defend both the status quo and their
privileges, they not only count on the power of their weapons, but
also on their tight grip on the media and most cultural and
educational means, which they use to mess with people's minds and
fool them into acting against their most elementary interests and
rights within the framework of a legal and social order ruled by
money and the marketplace which makes it sure that their wealth
prevails over natural human aspirations of peace, solidarity and
equality.
We Cubans have reason to expect that a
president-elect who has promised change, himself an expression of
change in the correlation of political forces right on the powerful
neighbor's ground, will pave the way for a new stage in the
relationship between Havana and Washington.
However, we are
aware that in order to keep the promise he made to the popular
movements and middle-class families who gave him their vote, Obama
would have to stand up to the same U.S. reactionary attitudes that
have hindered the development of the Cuban Revolution for half a
century.
If we follow that logic, this means a spectacular
shift in the state of affairs between Cuba and the U.S. as we have
known them throughout the 20th century and the first years of the
21st.
And for such things to become real in the Caribbean
region, the U.S. must give up not only its age-old ambition to have a
say in the island's fate, but also its thirst for global dominance.
This is because Cuba cannot turn its back on longstanding commitments
made to the Third World and the poor from rich nations whose
solidarity has been in the final analysis its principal means of
support to fight and resist for the last 50 years.
Obama’s
victory can be attributed to millions of African Americans -- an
ethnic group who suffered from a slave trade that remained legal
until 1865, followed by a century of Jim Crow laws and the Ku Klux
Klan's terrorist outrages capped later on by the violent repressive
action against the civil rights struggle in the 1960s, from which Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X and many other leaders of stature
came up.
We Cubans, of course, had no right to vote in this
election, but the fact that we have been victims of the same cruel
policies makes it clear to us that this victory of the American
people could give rise to a period of goodwill, peace and neighborly
gestures in the region and fuel democratization in international
relations.
Cuba only seeks respect for its independence from
Washington when the new government takes over on January 20,
2009.
It has been repeatedly said that Cuba's support of
Obama's candidacy stemmed from a wish to see the end of the economic
blockade or the release of the five heroic Cuban antiterrorists who
were convicted to unjust prison sentences in the U.S. more than ten
years ago. Or perhaps from hopes that a different administration
could put a stop to the attacks on and threats to the island and make
it possible to devote all human and material resources to the Cuban
people's economic and social development. Or to spread to the full
the profoundly democratic character of the Cuban socialist project,
without any hostile, powerful neighbor interfering in its domestic
and foreign affairs. Valid though they may be, all these reasons fit into a single hope: that by express wish of the American people a U.S. government be elected that respects Cuba's independence. Manuel E. Yepe Menéndez is a lawyer, economist and journalist. He is a professor at the Higher Institute of International Relations in Havana. He was Cuba's ambassador to Romania, general director of the Prensa Latina agency; vice president of the Cuban Institute of Radio and Television; founder and national director of the Technological Information System (TIPS) of the United Nations Program for Development in Cuba, and secretary of the Cuban Movement for the Peace and Sovereignty of the Peoples.
http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs2229.html |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|

President Obama, his latent example and inspiration for Cuba
By Rolando H. Castañeda y Lorenzo Cañizares
One hundred days into his administration, President Barack H. Obama shows the world a series of examples and challenges that are also particularly applicable to Cuba. He proposes to confront -- simultaneously and with determination -- several fundamental problems that affect U.S. society, and he wishes to establish good relations and détente with the rest of the world, especially with his closest neighbors.
On Sunday, death came to our dear poet, writer and comrade Mario Benedetti in Uruguay, his native country.
He taught us that our dead ask us to sing.

An example they’d like to impose on Cuba
By Germán Piniella
An article signed by Rolando H. Castañeda and Lorenzo Cañizares, published in this issue of Progreso Weekly (see “President Obama, His Latent Example and Inspiration for Cuba”) seems to pose an alternate position in regards to the relations of the island’s émigré.
It is convenient to remember similar perspectives in another moment in Cuban history. Halfway through the 19th century, when the country’s national conscience began to emerge, a roadway for the independence struggle was paved in the thoughts of the educator Felix Varela and the incendiary lyrics of Jose Maria Heredia. There were sectors of the bourgeoisie who feared that the “black danger” of the Haitian revolution would overpower Cuba, or that the “Jacobin” chaos would take the country towards the path of ruin. For these and other reasons two solutions arose: the autonomy linked to Spain and annexation to the United States.
By Bill Press
It's been 81 years since legendary coach Knute Rockne urged his players to "win one for the Gipper." But no Notre Dame football team ever faced a tougher challenge than President Obama does.
Since he was invited by university president Father John Jenkins to give this year's commencement address, Obama has faced a growing wave of protest. Judging from the howls of some critics, you'd think the devil himself was presiding over this year's graduation.
Notre Dame is one of our great universities...
Doing
what you want
“I’ve
experienced my own surge in
creativity… While it
would be nice to still be getting paid for my work, the need to be
more resourceful is having a beneficial effect on the arts community
around me. … Nobody wants
me to do anything, so I’m
just doing what I want.”
-- Liz Fallon, a visual artist from Maine, tells a NY Times reporter the bad economy has helped to spark her creativity.